Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Peterson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 2010No. OSB Case 06-109; SC S056480PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused with violating three provisions of the Oregon Rules of Professional Conduct (RPC): RPC 1.15-l(a) (requiring lawyer to account for client funds and to deposit and maintain client funds in trust), RPC 1.15-1(c) (requiring lawyer to withdraw client money only as fees are earned or expenses incurred), and RPC 8.4(a)(3) (prohibiting conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation). A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board concluded that the accused had violated the rules as alleged. As a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PhelpsOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In Re Complaint as to Conduct of MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ObertOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re BertoniOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  3. In re No.Oregon Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. RozanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. RozanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API