In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hostetter
Oregon Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In this lawyer disciplinary matter, the Bar charged the accused with ethical violations in two separate matters. In the Ingle matter, the Bar alleged that the accused violated the former-client conflict-of-interest rule. The trial panel concluded that the accused violated DR 5-105(C) and RPC 1.9(a) when, having represented the borrower in the underlying loan transaction, he subsequently represented the lender in collecting the loans from the borrower’s estate. In the Grohs matter, the Bar alleged that the accused violated the rule 1 against misrepresentation. The trial panel concluded that i…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HawsOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HockettOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State ex rel. S.G.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of ObertOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EllisOregon Supreme Court · 2015
- In re MaurerOregon Supreme Court · 2018
- In re SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PhinneyOregon Supreme Court · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.