Legal Opinion
Curtis Oil v. City of North Branch
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 2, 1985No. C0-84-1013PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
The City of North Branch appeals a writ of mandamus requiring it to rezone a parcel of land and to issue a conditional use permit which would allow Curtis Oil to install a 1000-gallon propane tank on the property. The City of North Branch contends that a writ of mandamus may not be used to challenge its denial of Curtis Oil’s application to rezone a parcel of land. We affirm.
FACTS
Leo and Betty Valez operated a gas station and repair shop on two lots which they owned in the City of North Branch. The two lots along with two others form a 175' by 200' parcel which is zoned…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- C. R. Investments, Inc. v. Village of ShoreviewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Rochester Ass'n of Neighborhoods v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Reserve Mining Co. v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Curry v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- City of Barnum v. County of CarltonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Kehr v. City of RosevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- City of Barnum v. County of CarltonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Day v. Wright CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.