Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Reserve Mining Co. v. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 5, 1985No. C2-84-1255PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

Relator Reserve Mining Company appeals a portion of an effluent discharge permit granted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. Reserve challenges the portion of the permit which set an amphi-bole fiber effluent limitation of 1 million fibers per liter. Reserve claims (1) the amphibole fiber limitation is arbitrary and capricious, (2) the MPCA exceeded its authority by setting this limitation, and (3) the 1 million fibers per liter limitation is not supported by substantial evidence.

FACTS

Reserve operates an on-land taconite tail-ings disposal facility at Mile…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Reserve Mining Co. v. Minnesota Pollution Control AgencySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Curtis Oil v. City of North BranchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. City of Barnum v. County of CarltonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. City of Minneapolis v. MoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  4. M.T. Properties, Inc. v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. City of Barnum v. County of CarltonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API