Legal Opinion

C. R. Investments, Inc. v. Village of Shoreview

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 13, 1981No. 50514PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT, Justice.

Appellant brought this mandamus action to require the Village of Shoreview to issue it a special use permit. Although the district court concluded that the Village had properly denied appellant’s application, our review of the village council’s reasons for its refusal to issue the permit and the factual basis for these reasons requires us to conclude that the refusal to issue the permit was arbitrary and unreasonable. We reverse and direct that the permit be issued.

In 1967 the village adopted a comprehensive development plan consisting of 6 planning reports and a comprehensive…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  2. Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Barton Contracting Co., Inc. v. City of AftonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  4. Hay v. Township of Grow, Anoka CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Neibarger v. Universal Coopertives, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Condor Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation v. City of St. Paul, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. White Bear Docking & Storage, Inc. v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API