Legal Opinion
Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota Heights
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 10, 2006No. A04-206PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.
Appellant City of Mendota Heights appeals from a Minnesota Court of Appeals decision affirming a Dakota County District Court writ of mandamus, which compels the city to amend its comprehensive plan to allow respondent Mendota Golf, LLP, to turn its golf course property into a residential development. We reverse, concluding that the city did not have a clear duty to amend its comprehensive plan and the city had a rational basis to deny Mendota Golfs proposed amendment to the comprehensive plan. However, because we conclude that there is a conflict between the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Frank's Nursery Sales, Inc. v. City of RosevilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- 500, LLC v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- Snaza v. City of Saint Paul, Minn.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of EaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Sanimax USA, LLC v. City of South St. PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2024
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.