Legal Opinion

City of Barnum v. County of Carlton

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 14, 1986No. C3-85-1419PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Judge.

This matter is before us on remand from the Minnesota Supreme Court, 389 N.W.2d 727, for reconsideration of our previous decision, City of Barnum v. County of Carlton, 386 N.W.2d 770 (Minn.Ct.App.1986), in light of the supreme court’s subsequent decision in White Bear Rod & Gun Club v. City of Hugo, 388 N.W.2d 739 (Minn.1986). We reverse the district court.

FACTS

The facts of this case are set forth at length in our previous opinion. City of Barnum, 386 N.W.2d 770. They need be set forth only briefly here. In 1984, the City of Barnum applied for a conditional use permit…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. White Bear Docking & Storage, Inc. v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davis County v. Clearfield CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
  2. St. Croix Development, Inc. v. City of Apple ValleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Chase v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Earthburners, Inc. v. County of CarltonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  5. Northern States Power Co. v. Blue Earth CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API