Legal Opinion
Kehr v. City of Roseville
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 12, 1988No. C5-87-2429PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appeal arises from the trial court’s finding appellant’s denial of respondent’s request for a variance is arbitrary and capricious and the trial court’s order granting respondent a special use permit, approval of respondent’s plat of proposed development and variance from appellant’s density requirements.
FACTS
Respondent, Alvin F. Kehr, is the owner of 1.55 acres in the City of Roseville. The property is zoned R-l, single family residential. Kehr applied to appellant, the City of Roseville, for a change of zoning from R-l to R-2 which would allow construction of a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Swanson v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- White Bear Docking & Storage, Inc. v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Graham v. Itasca County Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- Hurrle v. County of Sherburne Ex Rel. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- St. Croix Development, Inc. v. City of Apple ValleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Concept Properties, LLP v. City of MinnetristaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Uniprop Manufactured Housing, Inc. v. City of LakevilleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.