Legal Opinion

Curry v. Young

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 26, 1969No. 41678PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Knutson, Chief Justice.

Defendant city of Minneapolis appeals from an order deny-ings its motion for summary judgment in this action brought by plaintiffs as owners of the southerly portion of Lot 14, Block 3, Lowry’s First Subdivision of Columbia Heights, to compel the city to grant a setback variance from a zoning ordinance and a building permit to enable plaintiffs to build a dwelling house on the lot. The zoning ordinance, which was adopted in 1963, requires a setback of 25 feet from the street.

The trial court found that plaintiffs’ lot, in the absence of a variance, would be unusable for…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. State Ex Rel. Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Flagstad v. City of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Gleason v. University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. v. NadasdySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Littlefield v. City of AftonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Northpointe Plaza v. City of RochesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
  4. In Re StadsvoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  5. Littlefield v. City Of AftonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API