Legal Opinion

Day v. Wright County

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 29, 1986No. C9-85-2252PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Stephan Day appeals from a November 15, 1985 order denying his petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus which sought to compel the Wright County Board of Adjustments to declare that certain real property Day owns constitutes a “buildable lot” and entitles him to necessary building permits and licenses. On appeal, Day contends that Wright County Ordinance Section 404 is a grandfather clause which deems his property “buildable” as a matter of law and that, accordingly, a peremptory writ of mandamus was the appropriate remedy. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant Stephan…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49 v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. Curtis Oil v. City of North BranchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Enright v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Houck v. EASTERN CARVER COUNTY SCHOOLSCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  3. Rud v. JohnstonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
  4. Rud v. JohnstonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API