Day v. Wright County
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Stephan Day appeals from a November 15, 1985 order denying his petition for a peremptory writ of mandamus which sought to compel the Wright County Board of Adjustments to declare that certain real property Day owns constitutes a “buildable lot” and entitles him to necessary building permits and licenses. On appeal, Day contends that Wright County Ordinance Section 404 is a grandfather clause which deems his property “buildable” as a matter of law and that, accordingly, a peremptory writ of mandamus was the appropriate remedy. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellant Stephan…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- International Union of Operating Engineers, Local No. 49 v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Curtis Oil v. City of North BranchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Enright v. City of BloomingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Houck v. EASTERN CARVER COUNTY SCHOOLSCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Rud v. JohnstonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
- Rud v. JohnstonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024