Legal Opinion
City of Barnum v. County of Carlton
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 16, 1986No. C3-85-1419PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
The City of Barnum appeals the district court’s decision denying its request for a writ of mandamus compelling Carlton County to issue a conditional use permit to build a new wastewater treatment facility. The City of Barnum contends that Carlton County acted arbitrarily and capriciously in denying its application for a conditional use permit. We agree, and reverse the order of the district court.
FACTS
The City of Barnum is a small community of about 490 located in Carlton County, Minnesota. The city’s annual operating budget is about $90,000. Bamum’s existing sewage…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Chanhassen Estates Residents Ass'n v. City of ChanhassenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- C. R. Investments, Inc. v. Village of ShoreviewSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Davis County v. Clearfield CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
- Olson v. City of DeadwoodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Chase v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- City of Barnum v. County of CarltonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Bartheld v. County of KoochichingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.