Legal Opinion

State v. Lark

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1993No. CC C89-12-37103; CA A67396; SC S39550PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

In this criminal case, we are called on to apply “offense subcategories” provided in the Oregon sentencing guidelines, OAR chapter 253, division 4. OAR 253-04-001 provides in part:

“(1) The [sentencing guidelines] grid is a two-dimensional offense and criminal history classification tool. The grid’s vertical axis is the Crime Seriousness Scale which classifies current crimes of conviction. The grid’s horizontal axis is the Criminal History Scale which classifies criminal histories.
“(2) Each grid block states the presumptive sentence for an offender whose crime of conviction and criminal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. WedgeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. In the Matter of Marriage of Perlenfein and PerlenfeinOregon Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AllredCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. CasavanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. State v. O'QUINNCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API