Legal Opinion

State v. Adams

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1993No. CC 90-1081; CA A66738; SC S39019, S39080PublishedCited by 81 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*361GRABER, J.

The issue that we decide in this case relates to the scope of direct appellate review of a sentence imposed under the recently adopted sentencing guidelines: Does ORS 138.222 permit appellate review of a sentence imposed pursuant to an agreement between defendant and the state, where the sentencing court accepted defendant’s stipulated sentencing guidelines grid block classification and approved the corresponding stipulated sentence on the record, and where defendant contends for the first time on appeal that the sentence was a “departure” sentence and that the sentencing court did…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bartz v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Boone v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. McDonnellOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Kankkonen v. HENDRICKSONOregon Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by81 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Huddleston v. SawyerOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. KephartOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  5. State v. KilbornCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API