Legal Opinion

State v. Allred

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 26, 2000No. 98CR1564FE; CA A103666PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*228LINDER, J.

Defendant appeals his sentence for hindering prosecution. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in imposing a 36-month durational departure sentence. We conclude that the trial court erroneously interpreted and applied OAR 213-008-0002(l)(b)(J), the particular sentencing guideline on which the court relied in imposing defendant’s sentence. Consequently, we vacate the sentence for hindering prosecution and remand for resentencing.

Defendant pleaded guilty in connection with hindering the prosecution of Jesse Fanus, an individual who was suspected of murder.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. EdsonOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. CliffordOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. LarkOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. CliffordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Hosvaldo LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. State v. TeixeiraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  3. Goodness v. BeckhamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  5. State v. WerdellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API