Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. Ashley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1991No. CC 86-0195; CA A61020; SC S37156PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*171GRABER, J.

The principal issue in this case is whether the statutory psychotherapist-patient privilege applies to communications made during drug counseling. We conclude that the privilege does not apply. For the reasons discussed below, we reverse in part and remand the case to the Court of Appeals for further proceedings.

The state initiated a petition to terminate the parental rights of mother. ORS 419.523 (1987).1 At the time of the hearing, on May 10,1989, mother was incarcerated on forgery convictions. Mother admitted that she is dependent on controlled substances, but she testified that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fifth Avenue Corp. v. WASHINGTON COUNTY, ETC.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Whipple v. HowserOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. McClureOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. OlmsteadOregon Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bartz v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Stevens v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Boone v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1992

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API