State v. Casavan
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
After a stipulated facts trial, defendant was found guilty of burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. The sentencing court classified the conviction as a crime category 8 offense because it was committed in an occupied dwelling. OAR 253-04-002(2), App 3. Defendant assigns error to that classification. We review as a question of law a claim that the sentencing court erred in ranking the crime seriousness classification of the current crimes, ORS 138.222(4)(b), and affirm.
Under the sentencing guidelines, a conviction for first-degree burglary can fall within one of three crime categories,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WedgeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. BlantonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. FerrellOregon Supreme Court · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. EngenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. TravaliniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. GalitzenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- State v. MendezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.