Legal Opinion

State v. Casavan

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 13, 1996No. 10-94-03779; CA A85738PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

After a stipulated facts trial, defendant was found guilty of burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. The sentencing court classified the conviction as a crime category 8 offense because it was committed in an occupied dwelling. OAR 253-04-002(2), App 3. Defendant assigns error to that classification. We review as a question of law a claim that the sentencing court erred in ranking the crime seriousness classification of the current crimes, ORS 138.222(4)(b), and affirm.

Under the sentencing guidelines, a conviction for first-degree burglary can fall within one of three crime categories,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. WedgeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. State v. BlantonOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. FerrellOregon Supreme Court · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. EngenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. TravaliniCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  3. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. State v. GalitzenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  5. State v. MendezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API