State v. O'QUINN
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
After a trial to the court, defendant was found guilty of two counts of burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. 1 At sentencing, the court enhanced the sentences on the convictions from crime category 7 to category 9 on the ground that the state alleged and proved that defendant was armed with a deadly weapon in the commission of the offenses. OAR 253-04-002(2), App 3. Defendant appeals and assigns error to the sentencing classifications, arguing that the state failed to prove that he was armed with a deadly weapon and that, therefore, the court was required to rank the offenses in crime…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. MustainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- State v. LarkOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. MinterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norwood v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998