Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Marriage of Perlenfein and Perlenfein

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1993No. CC CV91-0251; CA A70807; SC S39607PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

The question in this domestic relations case is whether, under the applicable Oregon regulations, set out below, undistributed income of a closely held corporation that is attributed to a minority shareholder of that corporation for income tax purposes also is attributable to the shareholder for the purpose of determining a child support obligation. We answer that question “yes.”

Husband is the manager and a minority shareholder of Albany Rental, Inc., a closely held corporation. He receives a salary of $2,000 per month from the corporation and owns 27.5 percent of its shares. His mother owns…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bartz v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hughes v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. AshleyOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State Ex Rel. Willis v. WillisOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Columbia Steel Castings Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Roseburg School District v. City of RoseburgOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Osborn v. Psychiatric Security Review BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Christensen v. PackNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. DiltsOregon Supreme Court · 2003

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API