Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 7, 2001No. 9802-31388; CA A106044PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendant appeals from convictions after a bench trial for manufacture and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1); ORS 475.992(4). Defendant contends that the trial court erred in imposing enhanced sentences for the convictions by classifying them as “commercial drug offenses.” See ORS 475.996(l)(b). We review for errors of law, State v. Hennings, 134 Or App 131, 894 P2d 1192 (1995), and affirm.

Because defendant was convicted, we state the facts in the light most favorable to the state. State v. King, 307 Or 332, 339, 768 P2d 391 (1989). In January 1998, police officers went to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. CoriaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. State v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. Lupercio-QuezadaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. KinslowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. RankinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API