Legal Opinion

State v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 25, 2007No. 05CR0798; A131476PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of second-degree robbery, ORS 164.405, and received a mandatory minimum sentence of 70 months’ imprisonment pursuant to ORS 137.700. On appeal, defendant asserts that the court erred in concluding that he was not eligible for a lesser sentence under ORS 137.712, which authorizes a trial court to impose a sentencing guidelines sentence of less than the mandatory minimum sentence otherwise required by ORS 137.700 in certain circumstances. In response, the state agrees in essence with defendant’s interpretation of ORS 137.712, but argues that defendant’s assignment of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State v. StubbsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. State v. RennellsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. CobbCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  2. State v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  3. State v. GallegosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. State v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. HardingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API