Legal Opinion
First Charter National Bank v. Ross
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 4, 1994No. 14688PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
In this foreclosure action, we granted certification to review a determination by the Appellate Court that the fraudulent conduct of one guarantor of a corporate obligation in procuring the signature of a coguarantor should not be imputed to the creditor named in the guarantee. The plaintiff, First Charter National Bank, initiated an action to foreclose a mortgage executed by the defendants Robert A. Ross and Ann D. Ross in conjunction with their written guarantee of a $250,000 loan to the Midland Textile Corporation by a bank that was a predecessor of the plaintiff.1
After a default by the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- First Charter National Bank v. RossConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Arway v. BloomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Hyatt v. City of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Fleet Bank v. DowlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- First Charter National Bank v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
3Cited by8 opinions
- Phoenix Leasing, Inc. v. KosinskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Meyers v. Cornwell Quality Tools, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. MachadoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Martland v. Zoning Com'n of Town of WoodburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- In re Robin M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.