Phoenix Leasing, Inc. v. Kosinski
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
O’CONNELL, C. J.
The defendant appeals, following a trial to the court, from the judgment in favor of the plaintiff in an action brought to enforce a California judgment. The defendant claims that the trial court *651improperly (1) found that the California court had jurisdiction over the defendant and (2) denied his special defense of unreasonable disposition of collateral in violation of article nine of the Uniform Commercial Code. The defendant further claims that the plaintiff is barred from recovering judgment in this state because it failed to comply with article nine of the Uniform…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Underwriters National Assurance Co. v. North Carolina Life & Accident & Health Insurance Guaranty Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ameritas Investment Corp. v. McKinneyNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- MYRTLE MEWS ASS'N, INC. v. BordesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Meribear Productions, Inc. v. FrankConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Office Furniture Rental Alliance, LLC v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Discover Property & Casualty Insurance v. TETCO, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.