Legal Opinion
Meyers v. Cornwell Quality Tools, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided April 9, 1996No. 13783; 14089PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSchaller, J.
The defendants and the plaintiffs filed separate appeals1 in a fraud and Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA)2 action. The defendants3 appeal from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the plaintiffs on both counts.4 The defendants claim that the trial court improperly (1) submitted the CUTPA claim to the jury, (2) denied their motion to set aside the verdict on the fraud count, which they based on the plaintiffs’ claimed failure to make out a prima facie case and on the claim that the evidence was contrary to the verdict, (3) admitted evidence of…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Williams Ford, Inc. v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Foley v. Huntington Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Gagne v. VaccaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Edmands v. Cuno, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Silver v. JacobsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Anastasia v. Beautiful You Hair Designs, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.