Legal Opinion

Hyatt v. City of Milford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 26, 1993No. 14430PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The question posed by this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly affirmed the judgment of the trial court dismissing the plaintiff Harry Hyatt’s action, brought pursuant to General Statutes § 31-300,1 seeking the recovery of a *442sum allegedly due the plaintiff from a compensation award previously rendered against the city of Mil*443ford.2 The trial court had dismissed the plaintiffs action for his failure to exhaust his administrative remedies.

The Appellate Court determined that the issue presented by the plaintiffs action was not simply the collection of a liquidated sum, as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hyatt v. City of MilfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  2. State v. SantiagoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. State v. SoltesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Second Injury Fund v. LupachinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Arway v. BloomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Zaleta v. Town of FairfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  4. First Charter National Bank v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Fenton v. Connecticut Hospital Ass'n Workers' Compensation TrustConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API