Arway v. Bloom
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
This court granted certification in this zoning appeal to consider whether General Statutes §§ 8-3 (g) and 8-3c (b)1 require the decision of a zoning commission to be set aside when a decision of the wetlands commission affecting the same property is subsequently set aside as having been illegal. The plaintiffs, Christine Arway et ah,2 appealed to the Superior Court *801from a decision of the defendant zoning commission of the town of Redding approving a site plan and special permit application filed by the defendants Richard Bloom and Walter S. Bloom.3 Sustaining the plaintiffs’ appeal, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arway v. BloomConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Hyatt v. City of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Fleet Bank v. DowlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Arway v. BloomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gevers v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- First Charter National Bank v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Thoma v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Read v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Belcher v. Stafford Pzc, No. Cv 9558178s (Jun. 3, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.