Legal Opinion

Arway v. Bloom

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 2, 1993No. 14673PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This court granted certification in this zoning appeal to consider whether General Statutes §§ 8-3 (g) and 8-3c (b)1 require the decision of a zoning commission to be set aside when a decision of the wetlands commission affecting the same property is subsequently set aside as having been illegal. The plaintiffs, Christine Arway et ah,2 appealed to the Superior Court *801from a decision of the defendant zoning commission of the town of Redding approving a site plan and special permit application filed by the defendants Richard Bloom and Walter S. Bloom.3 Sustaining the plaintiffs’ appeal, the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arway v. BloomConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  2. Hyatt v. City of MilfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Fleet Bank v. DowlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Arway v. BloomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Gevers v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  2. First Charter National Bank v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Thoma v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Read v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  5. Belcher v. Stafford Pzc, No. Cv 9558178s (Jun. 3, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API