Legal Opinion

Fleet Bank v. Dowling

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 27, 1993No. 14610PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We granted a petition for certification in these cases to permit the defendants, Vincent J. Dowling, Jr., and Vincent J. Dowling, Sr., to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence adduced by the plaintiff, Fleet Bank of Connecticut, to establish probable cause for the issuance of a prejudgment remedy. The *448plaintiff’s complaints allege that each of the defendants, in violation of his contractual and statutory obligations, has failed to reimburse the plaintiff for payments made to designated third party beneficiaries pursuant to two irrevocable letters of credit. The Appellate Court concluded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lawler v. LawlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Armac Industries, Ltd. v. CitytrustSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Booth v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Fleet Bank v. DowlingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  5. Fleet Bank v. DowlingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Packtor v. Seppala & AHO Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Tovish v. Gerber ElectronicsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Arway v. BloomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. First Charter National Bank v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Haynes Construction v. Dorce, No. Cv02 0078802s (Dec. 24, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API