Legal Opinion
Martland v. Zoning Com'n of Town of Woodbury
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 2, 2009No. AC 29425PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The defendants, 1 the zoning commission of the town of Woodbury (commission), its chairman and the town clerk, appeal from the judgments of the trial court sustaining the administrative appeals of the plaintiffs, Theodore H. Martland and Martland Management, Inc. 2 On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly (1) determined that the record did not contain substantial evidence with respect to a specific condition imposed in connection with the approval of a special permit for pond excavation and (2) failed to determine that the condition was integral to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Reid v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- DeBeradinis v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Parish of St. Andrew's Protestant Episcopal Church v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Cambodian Buddhist Society of Connecticut, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Goulet v. Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- City of Meriden v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- American Institute for Neuro-Integrative development, Inc. v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019