Legal Opinion
Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Machado
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 1, 2004No. AC 23562PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant Virginia Scott Devlin-Machado (Devlin-Machado) appeals from the trial court’s decision rendering summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation (Chase), and the judgment of foreclosure by sale.1 Devlin-Machado claims that the court improperly granted Chase’s summary judgment motion because there were genuine issues of material fact to support her claims *185of fraud and duress.2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.3
On May 31, 2000, Devlin-Machado and her husband, Manuel Machado, Jr., executed a promissory note in favor of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Community Action for Greater Middlesex County, Inc. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Fidelity Bank v. KreniskyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. ParrottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Yale University v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Maruca v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Chiulli v. ZolaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- CitiMortgage, Inc. v. CoolbethConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- LORICCO TOWERS CONDOMINIUM ASS'N v. PantaniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- TD Banknorth, N.A. v. White Water Mountain Resorts of Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Johnson v. Raffy's Café I, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.