Legal Opinion
Baranowski v. Safeco Insurance Co. of America
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 26, 2010No. AC 30003PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiff, Charles J. Baranowski, Jr., appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of the defendant Sun-del & Milford, Inc. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) declined to instruct the jury that expert testimony was not required to apply the law and (2) granted the defendant’s motion to preclude the testimony of an expert witness. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to the disposition of the plaintiffs appeal. In March, 1998, the plaintiff met…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. GenottiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Florestal v. Government Employees InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- SS-II, LLC v. Bridge Street AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Grondin v. CuriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Peatie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance v. SakonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Milton v. RobinsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Umsteadt v. G. R. RealtyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Hodgate v. FerraroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Konover Residential Corp. v. ElazazyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.