Legal Opinion

SS-II, LLC v. Bridge Street Associates

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided September 1, 2009No. SC 18271PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZARELLA, J.

The principal issue in this appeal 1 is whether the plaintiff, SS-II, LLC, is entitled to specific performance of an option to purchase property owned by the defendant, Bridge Street Associates, under the terms of a commercial lease agreement between the parties. The trial court rejected the plaintiffs claim seeking specific performance and rendered summary judgment in favor of the defendant, concluding that the option to purchase did not comply with General Statutes § 52-550 (statute of frauds), 2 the defendant was not estopped under the doctrine of equitable estoppel from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Robert Lawrence Associates, Inc. v. Del VecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  5. Lynch v. DavisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. State v. RizzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
  3. Hurley v. Heart Physicians, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  4. Dilieto v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  5. FCM Group, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API