Legal Opinion
Grondin v. Curi
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 18, 2003No. SC 16769PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NORCOTT, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly concluded that an expert witness, testifying about the applicable standard of care in a medical malpractice action, must be board certified at the time of the alleged malpractice in order to qualify as a “ ‘similar health care provider’ ” under General Statutes § 52-184c (c) and (d).1 The plaintiff, Kelly Gron*639din, individually and as administratrix of the estate of her daughter, Ashley M. Grondin (decedent), appeals2 from the trial court’s judgment of nonsuit for failure to establish a prima facie case in a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Fitzmaurice v. FlynnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Thomas v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Cadle Co. v. D'AddarioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Bennett v. New Milford Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Jackson v. Water Pollution Control AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- DiLieto v. County Obstetrics & Gynecology Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.