Legal Opinion
Umsteadt v. G. R. Realty
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 3, 2010No. AC 30870PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The defendants, G. R. Realty, trustee for Ronald Zoarski and Gerald Zoarski, and Ronald Zoarski and Gerald Zoarski, appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their motion to set aside the jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Christine Umsteadt. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly: (1) failed to deliver their requested jury charge in accordance with the principles of Kraus v. Newton, 211 Conn. 191, 558 A.2d 240 (1989), although the evidence supported the instruction; (2) instructed the jury on constructive notice without a proper…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kraus v. NewtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- National Publishing Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Wasko v. FarleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Sinert v. Olympia & York Development Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Baranowski v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Dominguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2013
- Belevich v. Renaissance I, LLC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- Brenda J. Alcala v. Marriott International, Inc. and Courtyard Management Corporation D/B/A Quad Cities Courtyard by MarriottSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Brenda J. Alcala v. Marriott International, Inc. and Courtyard Management Corporation D/B/A Quad Cities Courtyard by MarriottSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.