Legal Opinion
Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance v. Sakon
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 6, 2011No. AC 32109PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The defendant John A. Sakon 1 appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company. On appeal, the defendant argues that the court erroneously determined that the plaintiff owed no duty to defend or to indemnify the defendant by concluding that (1) the business exclusion of the homeowner’s insurance policy issued by the plaintiff applied and (2) the plaintiff was not estopped from asserting the business exclusion. 2 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Heyman Associates No. 1 v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- QSP, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Novella v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Buell Industries, Inc. v. Greater New York Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Lone Star Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co. v. PasiakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Mangiafico v. State Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Stott v. Peerless InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- AMCO Insurance Company v. Ralph W. MelloCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018
- Haber v. Bankers Standard Insurance CoDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.