Hodgate v. Ferraro
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The plaintiff, Charles R. Hodgate, administrator of the estate of Tavis W. Hodgate, 1 appeals from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendants Roger A. Silva and Wellington Sales & Installation Company, Inc. (Wellington). On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) determined that Massachusetts law, rather than Connecticut law, applied to the present case, (2) concluded that no genuine issue of material fact existed and (3) prevented the plaintiff from conducting discovery. 2 We axe not persuaded by the plaintiffs claims and, accordingly,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Saharceski v. MarcureMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Neyland v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Brown v. Nutter, McClennen & FishMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Rafalko v. University of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- White v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Bank of America, N.A. v. GroginsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Marut v. INDYMAC BANK, FSBConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012