Legal Opinion

Florestal v. Government Employees Insurance

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 19, 1996No. 14953; 14954PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.

The principal issue raised by these consolidated appeals is whether we should overrule our decision in American Motorists Ins. Co. v. Gould, 213 Conn. 625, 569 A.2d 1105 (1990), overruled in part on other grounds, Covenant Ins. Co. v. Coon, 220 Conn. 30, 37, 594 A.2d 977 (1991), wherein we concluded that a tortfeasor is not underinsured within the meaning of General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 38-175c (b) (2), now recodified as § 38a-336 (e),1 unless the aggregate limits of the tortfeasor’s liability insurance coverage applicable at the time of the accident are less than the underinsured…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Colwell v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
  2. State v. LockhartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Luce v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  4. Hammond v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. Perez v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API