Legal Opinion
Peatie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 6, 2009No. AC 28387PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
In this negligence action, the plaintiff, Rita Peatie, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury verdict in favor of the defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. The plaintiff claims on appeal that the court improperly (1) bound her “in lieu of’ attorney to the scheduling order agreed to by her previous attorney, (2) refused to lift a protective order, (3) excluded some of the testimony of her expert from the jury’s consideration, (4) included a jury instruction regarding the calculation of economic damages and (5) was biased in favor of the defendant. We…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Struckman v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Aspiazu v. OrgeraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. FullwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Kuxhausen v. Tillman Partners, L.P.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. BertrandConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Coss v. StewardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Massey v. TOWN OF BRANFORDConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- West Haven Lumber Co. v. Sentry Construction Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.