Rosenblum v. Levy
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco setting apart a homestead to the widow of a deceased testator. James M. Troutt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
ANGELLOTTI, J.—
These are appeals from an order setting apart from the property of the estate of deceased a homestead for the use of the surviving wife for and during the period of administration of said estate and until its final distribution. One appeal is taken by the executors of the will of deceased, and the other by certain devisees and legatees under his will. It cannot be held that the executors are not “parties aggrieved” by such an order, within the meaning of those words as used in the law relative to the right of appeal. (In re Heydenfeldt, 117 Cal. 551.) The devisees appealing are…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- In re Estate of WalkerlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Beronio v. Ventura County Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- Lubbock v. McMannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Ackley & Dana v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- In re the Estate of HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- In Re Estate of BumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Estate of KesslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- McKay v. GesfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Viotti v. GiomiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Estate of NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.