Legal Opinion

Beronio v. Ventura County Lumber Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1900No. L.A. No. 638PublishedCited by 46 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Suit to quiet title. The complaint sets forth that in the year 1884 Gaetano Beronio, Sr., was the owner of the land involved in the action, and built thereon a two-story brick building for the purpose of conducting therein a general merchandise store and hotel. He was at that time unmarried, and with his servants conducted said business and hotel until December 29, 1886, when he married, and thereafter with his wife continued to conduct said business, occupying a portion of the building with his family for that purpose-There were several other buildings upon the lot, separated from the hotel…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Lewis v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  4. Cromwell v. . MacLeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Leeper v. BeltramiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. California Trust Co. v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Willis v. WillisWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Henck v. Lake Hemet Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Rosenblum v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API