McKay v. Gesford
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. H. Stewart, and White, Miller & McLaughlin, for Appellant.-
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This action is in ejectment. It was brought by plaintiff as special administratrix of the estate of Julia D. Ferguson, deceased, claiming that certain real property belonged to the estate of her intestate.
Defendant admitted that the property in question had originally been the separate property of Julia D. Ferguson but averred and showed that Julia D. Ferguson, while the wife of A. H. Ferguson and while she with her husband was residing in the house upon the land in controversy, filed her declaration of homestead for the joint benefit of herself and her husband. Julia D. Ferguson…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Rosenblum v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Ackley & Dana v. ChamberlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- McDonald v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Heathman v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Hunter v. SparlingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Garrison v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Viotti v. GiomiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Lee v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.