Legal Opinion

Ackley & Dana v. Chamberlain

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1860PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Appeal from the Eleventh District. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion. Defendant had judgment. Plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtField, C. J.

Cope, J. concurring.

This is an action to recover the possession of certain premises situated in Placer county. The plaintiffs claim title by virtue of a conveyance from the Sheriff of that county, bearing date in March, 1859, executed upon the purchase of the premises at a sale under judgment and execution against one Daniel Guión. The judgment was recovered in August, 1858, and the sale was made in September following. At the time, and for nearly a year previous, the premises were the property of Guión, and the principal building erected thereon was occupied as the residence of himself and…

2Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sargeant v. SargeantTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Rosenblum v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Smith v. Guckenheimer & SonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
  4. McKay v. GesfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Heathman v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API