In Re Estate of Bump
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal by the executors of the estate of Nelson Bump, deceased, and by the heirs and devisees of the deceased from an order allowing the widow of the deceased the sum of one hundred dollars a month out of the estate for her support during the pendency of the administration.
The fact that the widow may have had property of her own out of which she could have supported herself without -aid from the estate is immaterial. (Estate of Lux, 100 Cal. 593, 603, [35 Pac. 341].) A large part of the evidence appears to have been devoted to an attempt to prove this immaterial fact.
The contention…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In re estate of LuxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Rosenblum v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Estate of HuelsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Pyle v. PiercyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- In re the Estate of LahiffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Security-First National Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Middlebrook v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Landers v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Estate of King v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.