Legal Opinion

Viotti v. Giomi

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1964No. Civ. 21235PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

This ease involves an appeal by defendant and cross-complainant Giomi, an unsatisfied judgment creditor, from a judgment quieting title in plaintiffs Viotti to property which Giomi had purchased at an execution sale. The court found that plaintiffs had a valid homestead and that Giomi had failed to comply with section 1245 of the Civil Code. The cross-defendant title company appeals from the judgment quieting title in plaintiffs and also from a judgment for Giomi holding it liable for failure to note plaintiffs’ homestead in its litigation report to Giomi.

The facts are not in dispute. In…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Basin Oil Co. v. Baash-Ross Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. Hawkins v. Oakland Title Insurance & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Rosenblum v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Smith v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. McKay v. GesfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Union Oil Company v. James J. Oppen and John J. MastersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. Jarchow v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Ford v. Guarantee Abstract & Title Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Northwestern Title Security Co. v. FlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Cohen v. Kite Hill Community Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API