Legal Opinion

Lubbock v. McMann

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1889No. 12053PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFox, J.

Judgment was rendered in this case in Department One of this court September 9, 1889, affirming the orders appealed from. Reference is made to the opinion filed at that time for a statement of the case, and for the rulings then made upon the points considered, which rulings are still adhered to. The parties have since, by stipulation, waived all controversy upon the points then discussed, but an orderly and intelligible disposition of the case requires that rulings should be had upon those points, and after a careful reconsideration of the case in Bank, we see no reason to change the decision…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. SalorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Maloney v. HeferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Laughlin v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Tiernan v. His CreditorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Waggle v. WorthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Rosenblum v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Smith v. Guckenheimer & SonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1900
  3. Union Oil Co. v. Norton-Morgan Commercial Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Heathman v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Sanders v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API