In re the Estate of Heydenfeldt
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco directing the executors of the will of a deceased person to redeem certain land from a foreclosure sale. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
This appeal is by the executors from an order of the probate court requiring them to redeem certain land from a foreclosure sale.
The testator, some time prior to his death, had executed deeds which he delivered to Charles Ashton, to be delivered to the parties named upon his death. In his will he recognized and confirmed these deeds as a provision made for certain of his children who were the grantees named in the deeds. He also provided that his debts should be paid out of his unproductive property.
Before he made and delivered the above deeds to Ashton, and before the making of the will, he…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bates v. RybergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Roach v. CoffeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- In re Estate of HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by29 opinions
- In Re Estate of ColtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Chase v. LeiterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Rosenblum v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Estate of KesslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Estate of Bailey v. CullenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.