Tompkins v. Powers
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
GATES, J., pro tem.
This action was commenced by the respondent to renew a judgment for a deficiency on a foreclosure action against appellant, the sole defendant. Judgment was rendered in favor of respondent in the sum of $1520.28, interest and costs. The undisputed facts are substantially as follows: On April 16, 1913, Russ Avery made his certain promissory note for the sum of $16,000, due five years after date, and on the same day executed a mortgage to secure the indebtedness on lands described in the foreclosure action to one Margaret A. Balcom, payee in the note. On June 11, 1918, Avery…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Herd v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Adams v. White Bus LineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Williams v. NaftzgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Braun v. CrewCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- In re Estate of BabyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Sanders v. MagillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Bank of America National Trust and Savings Ass'n v. DennisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Tucker v. NicholsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Harris v. Whittier Building & Loan Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.