Herd v. Tuohy
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, C.
A judgment was recovered by the defendant herein, against the plaintiff and others, in the superior court of Txrlare County, February 15, 1897, for the foreclosure of a mortgage made by the latter to the former. In the judgment as originally entered, there was no adjudication that the plaintiff was personally liable, or provision for a deficiency judgment against him; but afterwards, March 13, 1897, on an ex parte application of the defendant’s attorneys, the judgment was amended by adding thereto a paragraph adjudging the plaintiff to be personally liable on the mortgage, and that,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Union Mutual Life Insurance v. HanfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Sichler v. LookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Daggett v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Scamman v. BonslettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Tuohy v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Paige v. SinclairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Estate of ArbuckleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Lyons v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
- Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.