Tucker v. Nicholson
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
The three plaintiffs allege that they paid in full a deficiency judgment entered against them and six other persons after a mortgage foreclosure sale. They bring the present action against the executrix of the estate of one-of said six judgment debtors to recover his proportionate part of the debt paid by plaintiffs. Defendant executrix prosecutes this appeal from a judgment that she is liable in the sum of $4,026.09 for one-fourth of the deficiency judgment.
The deficiency judgment was entered on August 23, 1932. On July 22, 1933, the plaintiffs herein paid to the judgment creditor $5,816.61,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Chipman v. Morill & WebsterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Forsythe v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Williams v. RiehlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Ralston v. WoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1853
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Underwood v. Waterslides of Mid-America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- In Re National Mortgage Equity Corp. Mortgage Pool Certificates Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1987
- Winzler & Kelly v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Larsen v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
- Paradise Valley Hospital v. SchlossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.