Legal Opinion

Adams v. White Bus Line

California Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1921No. L. A. No. 6401PublishedCited by 39 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.

In this case the plaintiff, Mary I. Adams, obtained judgment against the defendant White Bus Line, a corporation, and defendant George E. Stiles, jointly, for injuries inflicted by the concurrent negligence of defendants. The defendant White Bus Line carried indemnity insurance with the Western Indemnity Company, an insurance corporation. This company paid the amount of the judgment to plaintiff, and at its request the company instead of entering satisfaction, assigned this judgment to one Powell, manager of defendant White Bus Line.

After this payment had been made to plaintiff, the defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harbeck v. . VanderbiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Ankeny v. MoffettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Forsythe v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Dow v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Charles v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Witt v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Peters v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Munoz v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. NakanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. Ho SingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API