Legal Opinion

Braun v. Crew

California Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1920No. L. A. No. 6083PublishedCited by 38 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The defendants, Thomas Crew and Penninnah Crew, his wife, appeal from the judgment.

The complaint states a cause of action to foreclose a mortgage executed by the two appellants to the plaintiff. The court gave judgment foreclosing the mortgage and providing for a deficiency judgment against the two appellants in case the foreclosure sale did not satisfy the debt. The appellants do not complain of the portion of the judgment foreclosing the mortgage. Their objection is to the provision for the deficiency judgment against them, their claim being that they have been released from personal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Murray v. . MarshallNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Woodward v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Herd v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Williams v. NaftzgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Everts v. MattesonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Ore-Ida Potato Products, Inc. v. United Pacific InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Zastrow v. KnightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Alexander v. AngelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API