Legal Opinion
Everts v. Matteson
California Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 1942No. L. A. 18408PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
— The appellants have been held liable for the difference between the amount due and unpaid upon a promissory note made by their predecessors in interest and the sum for which the real property securing the indebtedness was sold under the provisions of a deed of trust. The important question for decision concerns their right to limit the amount of any judgment by the fair value of the property at the time of the sale.
In 1934, the defendants Matteson borrowed $22,500 from Bank of America. To obtain this loan, which was made at the Whittier branch of the institution,- the Mattesons executed…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Herd v. TuohyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Sather Banking Co. v. Arthur R. Briggs Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Hatch v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Martin v. BeckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Williams v. NaftzgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- In Re Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie Kirkland, Debtors. Security Pacific National Bank v. Larry Dean Kirkland and Billie KirklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- People v. GordonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- United States Leasing Corp. v. duPontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Union Bank v. GradskyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Founders Bank and Trust Co. v. UpsherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.